Skip to content

red: init at 0bfb499#90035

Closed
4z3 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
4z3:red
Closed

red: init at 0bfb499#90035
4z3 wants to merge 1 commit intoNixOS:masterfrom
4z3:red

Conversation

@4z3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@4z3 4z3 commented Jun 10, 2020

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS linux)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

jtojnar
jtojnar reviewed Jun 10, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jtojnar jtojnar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

red attribute name is already taken, hence the failure.

@4z3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

4z3 commented Jun 10, 2020 •
edited
Loading

red attribute name is already taken, hence the failure.

Not sure what the best alternative name would be, so I've just prefixed it with go-. Question now is, whether it makes sense to rename the directory and the pname to go-red.

@doronbehar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

doronbehar commented Jun 13, 2020

Question now is, whether it makes sense to rename the directory and the pname to go-red.

I'd leave that as - it's easy enough to note the difference between both attributes by noting the different path under <nixpkgs> in which the drv is defined.

Lassulus
Lassulus reviewed Aug 22, 2020
View reviewed changes
@Lassulus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Lassulus commented Sep 8, 2020 

error: build of '/nix/store/5s7ws1ryq62mcdma9x7dxz72pz4hy2m9-red-unstable-2019-04-04-go-modules.drv' on 'ssh://nix@morpheus.r' failed: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/hghvy88y8j1i00ldnwcp1k630jii1m5h-red-unstable-2019-04-04-go-modules':
  wanted: sha256:0640x6p5hi7yp001cw13z5a17bi9vgd3gij5fxa1y06d3848cv7l
  got:    sha256:0a107hiaid0fprbm8lzakkqz5xlvrwv43b3avz3cxmix59xy0d7i
builder for '/nix/store/5s7ws1ryq62mcdma9x7dxz72pz4hy2m9-red-unstable-2019-04-04-go-modules.drv' failed with exit code 1; last 10 log lines:
  go: downloading golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190222072716-a9d3bda3a223
  go: downloading golang.org/x/text v0.3.0
  go: downloading github.com/mattn/go-runewidth v0.0.4
  go: downloading github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful v0.0.0-20181028223441-12d3b2882a08
  go: downloading github.com/gdamore/encoding v1.0.0
  go: downloading github.com/rivo/uniseg v0.0.0-20190313204849-f699dde9c340
  installing
  hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/hghvy88y8j1i00ldnwcp1k630jii1m5h-red-unstable-2019-04-04-go-modules':
    wanted: sha256:0640x6p5hi7yp001cw13z5a17bi9vgd3gij5fxa1y06d3848cv7l
    got:    sha256:0a107hiaid0fprbm8lzakkqz5xlvrwv43b3avz3cxmix59xy0d7i
cannot build derivation '/nix/store/ajl51kpjpfpb9mcdv8b7g69vr4cnc2b9-red-unstable-2019-04-04.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
cannot build derivation '/nix/store/sial4pfnpwffnc8jkxxlg3x49sw7jpvc-env.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built

@4z3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

4z3 commented Sep 8, 2020

I'm not interested in maintaining this anymore, sorry. 🥇

@4z3 4z3 closed this Sep 8, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Sep 8, 2020
@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from kalbasit September 8, 2020 18:27
@ofborg ofborg bot added 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by a maintainer of all the package it changes. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. labels Sep 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Lassulus Lassulus Lassulus left review comments

@jtojnar jtojnar jtojnar left review comments

@kalbasit kalbasit Awaiting requested review from kalbasit

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 11.by: package-maintainer This PR was created by a maintainer of all the package it changes.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@4z3 @doronbehar @Lassulus @jtojnar